Hi all…
So after last week’s playtest, I decided to go back to the drawing board a bit to see how I could revamp the Moebius Adventures system mechanics to make them a) simpler and b) more consistent. I think I’ve hit upon a solution, but it seems to run counter-intuitive to how most other mechanics go (besides GURPS anyway).
To make a long story short, part of the issues stemmed from having too many details and part came from a lack of clear explanation on my part. So I’ve stripped the system down to its core three statistics – Mind, Body, and Soul. Mind would wrap anything remotely mentally-challenging – so tasks like reading, arithmetic, arcane magic, and so on. Body is pretty self explanatory – but would enc0mpass strength, endurance, dexterity, and so on. And Soul represents wisdom, faith, life force, etc.
I need some help to see if I’m totally nuts or not. I spoke with a good friend of mine whose concern is that this system focuses on having a low number whereas most focus on having a higher one. I think this is an artificial difference, but that’s just me…
So rather than splitting those three into 12 different characteristics (plus the 4 for Random characteristics like Luck, Beauty, Wealth, and Family for a grand total of 16) I’ve boiled everything back to basics. At most, this means a skill would have one main characteristic. For example – Literacy would be Mind-based. Swordsmanship would be Body-based. Prayer would be Soul-based, and so on… (There are some skills like Healing, which the player would have to choose either Mind – for first-aid type healing using your brain – or Soul – for laying on hands kind of healing. Same for Writing, and several others.)
So a character would be very simply the core stats of Mind, Body, and Soul, some derivative/secondary stats like hit points, reality check, etc., and a list of skills – some from childhood, the rest from backgrounds.
(The design question is all the way at the end of this bloody long post, so my apologies. But I work through the basics, define some mechanics, provide an example, and THEN ask for input at the end. Please bear with me.)
So a fighter character that used 20 points to split among Mind, Body, and Soul might look something like this:
——————————————————————————————
Mind: 5
Body: 10
Soul: 5
HP 40
Skills:
Swords (Body): 3 ranks
Shield (Body): 2 ranks
Combat Sense (Mind): 2 ranks
Running (Body): 2 ranks
Horsemanship (Soul): 1 ranks
——————————————————————————————
A thief character might look like this:
——————————————————————————————
Mind: 6
Body: 8
Soul: 6
HP 32
Skills:
Swords (Body): 4 ranks
Acrobatics (Body): 3 ranks
Archery (Body): 2 ranks
Combat Sense (Mind): 3 ranks
——————————————————————————————
Pretty straightforward.
So let’s take the new mechanic for a spin…
To determine the base target for a skill, take the characteristic and add the # of ranks. You want to roll below that on 1d20 or 2d10. (1d20 is more “random” but 2d10 has a better bell curve for results.)
Everything revolves around the Quality of a roll.
If you roll under the target, you determine the Quality of Success (QoS) by taking the target # minus the the die roll.
If you roll over the target, you determine the Quality of Failure (QoF) by taking the die roll minus the target #.
The GM can always modify the target # by other conditions. For example, snow would make tracking easier. Crossing a stream would make it more difficult.
If uncontested, a QoS of 1 or higher means success.
If contested, you compare the two Quality rolls and the highest QoS wins. For example…
- For a Body (Strength) check, if character A has a QoS of 3 and character B has a QoF of 3, character A wins. But if character A has a QoS of 3 and character B has a QoS of 5, character B wins.
- For a skill check, you may be comparing two different skills, but the principle still applies. If character A has Tracking (Mind) and a QoS of 4 and character B has Concealment (Mind) and a QoS of 6, character A is unable to find the tracks left behind by character B.
QoF comes more into play where Combat is concerned.
To resolve a combat action, take the offensive skill Quality and compare it to the defensive skill Quality. The difference determines the amount of damage done (up to the maximum of the weapon + any bonus for Body of 7 or better or penalty for Body of 3 or less).
Here’s a sample combat between the Fighter and Thief characters. The Fighter has a long sword, which does 8 points of damage as its potential maximum, but also gains +4 to damage for a Body of 10. The Thief has a short sword, which does 7 points of damage as its potential maximum, but he has a Body of 8, which gives him a +2 to damage as well.
———————————————————————————————-
Initiative:
- Fighter – d20 (14) – target 7 – QoF = 7
- Thief – d20 (17) – target 9 – QoF = 8
- Fighter goes first w/lower QoF
Round 1
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 2 – target 13 – QoS = 11
- Thief dodges with a roll. Rolls 4 – target 11 – QoS = 7
- Fighter hits Thief for 4 points (QoS 11 – QoS 7 = difference of 4). Thief down to 28 HP.
- Thief attacks with sword. Rolls 4 – target 12 – QoS = 8
- Fighter parries with Shield. Rolls 20 – target 12 – QoF = 8 (rolled 1 or 2 is critical success/rolled 19 or 20 are critical failure – so the Fighter may have dropped his shield during this failed attempt)
- Thief gets solid hit in. Difference between attack & defense is 16. Short sword does 9 max. Thief does 9 damage to Fighter. Fighter down to 31 HP.
Round 2
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 15 – target 13 – QoF = 2
- Thief dodges with a cartwheel. Rolls 19 – target 11 – QoF = 8 (Critical Failure?)
- Fighter misses.
- Thief attacks with sword. Rolls 5 – target 12 – QoS = 7
- Fighter parries with Shield. Rolls 5 – target 12 – QoS = 7
- Fighter parries (tie goes to parrier).
Round 3
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 15 – target 13 – QoF = 2
- Thief dodges. Rolls 10 – target 11 – QoS = 1
- Fighter misses.
- Thief attacks. Rolls 16 – target 12 – QoF = 4
- Fighter parries with Shield. Rolls 10 – target 12 – QoS = 2
- Fighter parries.
Round 4
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 16 – target 13 – QoF = 3
- Thief dodges. Rolls 10 – target 11 – QoS = 1
- Fighter misses.
- Thief attacks. Rolls 14 – target 12 – QoF = 2
- Fighter parries. Rolls 11 – target 12 – QoS = 1
- Fighter parries.
Round 5
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 8 – target 13 – QoS = 5
- Thief dodges. Rolls 20 – target 11 – QoF = 9 (Critical Failure?)
- Fighter gets solid hit in. Difference is 14. Longsword does 11 max. Fighter does 11 damage to Thief. Thief down to 17 HP.
- Thief attacks. Rolls 18 – target 12 – QoF = 6
- Fighter parries with shield. Rolls 10 – target 11 – QoS = 1
- Fighter parries.
Round 6
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 5 – target 13 – QoS = 8
- Thief dodges. Rolls 13 – target 11 – QoF = 2.
- Fighter gets another solid hit in. Difference is 10. Fighter does 11 damage to Thief. Thief down to 6 HP.
- Thief attacks. Rolls 11 – target 12 – QoS = 1
- Fighter parries. Rolls 13 – target 11 – QoF = 2
- Thief hits. Difference is 3. Thief does 3 damage to Fighter. Fighter down to 28.
Round 7
- Fighter attacks with sword. Rolls 8 – target 13 – QoS = 5
- Thief dodges. Rolls 12 – target 11 – QoF = 1
- Fighter hits. Difference is 6. Fighter does 6 damage. Thief falls.
———————————————————————————————-
So… Deep breaths. After seeing a couple of sample characters, describing the basic mechanic, and providing a combat example…
Does this make sense? Is it too hard? Is the Quality of Success vs. Quality of Failure thing too difficult a concept?
The potential problems that I’ve come up with are… With a characteristic and skill each maxed at rank 10, you have a target # of 20 before modifiers. If you roll a 20 on a d20 or two 10s on 2d10, it’s a critical failure. Is that a bad thing? I don’t think so. Even perfect people fail sometimes IMHO.
I’m curious to hear what people think about this. If I’m barking up the wrong tree, I want to know early so I can change trees. 
Thanks in advance.
–Fitz
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=194876a7-4e25-4f56-8fca-5e9bd3188959)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=fe39737e-fe3d-4708-8f7e-5763e1412435)
